<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podcasting: The Fax Machine of &#8216;06</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joeldowns.com/2006/08/16/podcasting-the-fax-machine-of-06/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joeldowns.com/2006/08/16/podcasting-the-fax-machine-of-06/</link>
	<description>Media, Marketing, Technology, and a tune-up</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: peter b</title>
		<link>http://joeldowns.com/2006/08/16/podcasting-the-fax-machine-of-06/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>peter b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 00:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeldowns.com/2006/08/16/podcasting-the-fax-machine-of-06/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>I always associated podcasting to flycasting in fishing -- those podcasters, they reel in their listeners one at a time... and often times, they don't reel in anybody.  I read somewhere, the average podcast has less than 2 dozen listeners.  I would have had more when I huddled around the microphone with my friends all those years ago -- but, I didn't come from a big enough family. 

Joel... I'm with you... it's a damn mp3 for chrissakes, and it's usually binary: suitable for listening to zero or one times. But marketeers have a hold of this word, so it really doesn't have anything to do with anything, except hype.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always associated podcasting to flycasting in fishing &#8212; those podcasters, they reel in their listeners one at a time&#8230; and often times, they don&#8217;t reel in anybody.  I read somewhere, the average podcast has less than 2 dozen listeners.  I would have had more when I huddled around the microphone with my friends all those years ago &#8212; but, I didn&#8217;t come from a big enough family. </p>
<p>Joel&#8230; I&#8217;m with you&#8230; it&#8217;s a damn mp3 for chrissakes, and it&#8217;s usually binary: suitable for listening to zero or one times. But marketeers have a hold of this word, so it really doesn&#8217;t have anything to do with anything, except hype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joel</title>
		<link>http://joeldowns.com/2006/08/16/podcasting-the-fax-machine-of-06/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeldowns.com/2006/08/16/podcasting-the-fax-machine-of-06/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>The dictionary definition of broadcast still implies that the transmission is not initiated by the user - that the publisher is sending it out "for public or general use" and that the public may use it or ignore it (as they do a television program.)  By your definition, iTunes is a broadcaster, as are YouTube and Napster, and I doubt many people would agree with that.

Yes, we will have to wait until phones catch up to iPods in terms of storage and interface, but as I said, this is an evolution and the race isn't over yet.  Give it a few years for the storage and download rates for phones to increase.  You can already get phones with as much storage as a iPod Nano.  Within a couple years, 10GB (or more) will be standard storage on a cell phone.  Eventually, wireless bandwidth will be higher as well, so storing files on portable device will gradually become less important because you'll be able to stream them from anywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dictionary definition of broadcast still implies that the transmission is not initiated by the user - that the publisher is sending it out &#8220;for public or general use&#8221; and that the public may use it or ignore it (as they do a television program.)  By your definition, iTunes is a broadcaster, as are YouTube and Napster, and I doubt many people would agree with that.</p>
<p>Yes, we will have to wait until phones catch up to iPods in terms of storage and interface, but as I said, this is an evolution and the race isn&#8217;t over yet.  Give it a few years for the storage and download rates for phones to increase.  You can already get phones with as much storage as a iPod Nano.  Within a couple years, 10GB (or more) will be standard storage on a cell phone.  Eventually, wireless bandwidth will be higher as well, so storing files on portable device will gradually become less important because you&#8217;ll be able to stream them from anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhaddad</title>
		<link>http://joeldowns.com/2006/08/16/podcasting-the-fax-machine-of-06/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>jhaddad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeldowns.com/2006/08/16/podcasting-the-fax-machine-of-06/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Definition of broadcast: To transmit (a radio or television program) for public or general use.

Doesn't have to be distributed simultaneously.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/broadcast

I don't think that being on-demand invalidates it as a broadcast.

We will have to wait till phones are good enough to replace ipods as people's music players of choice.  I like having all my music with me, so I'll continue to keep using my iPod.  I wouldn't be surprised if they keep calling it podcasting even after it's streaming to the phone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definition of broadcast: To transmit (a radio or television program) for public or general use.</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t have to be distributed simultaneously.</p>
<p><a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/broadcast" rel="nofollow">http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/broadcast</a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that being on-demand invalidates it as a broadcast.</p>
<p>We will have to wait till phones are good enough to replace ipods as people&#8217;s music players of choice.  I like having all my music with me, so I&#8217;ll continue to keep using my iPod.  I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if they keep calling it podcasting even after it&#8217;s streaming to the phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
