<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Google doesnâ€™t care about Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joeldowns.com/2007/04/19/why-google-doesn%e2%80%99t-care-about-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joeldowns.com/2007/04/19/why-google-doesn%e2%80%99t-care-about-search/</link>
	<description>Product management in media and tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:13:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PHILIP</title>
		<link>http://joeldowns.com/2007/04/19/why-google-doesn%e2%80%99t-care-about-search/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>PHILIP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeldowns.com/2007/04/19/why-google-doesn%e2%80%99t-care-about-search/#comment-97</guid>
		<description>&quot;The greater the profit the greater the greed.&quot;

Greed has finally infected a once remarkable company.  Those college &#039;kids&#039; grew up and have become infected with the corporate mentality that has just about ruined this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The greater the profit the greater the greed.&#8221;</p>
<p>Greed has finally infected a once remarkable company.  Those college &#8216;kids&#8217; grew up and have become infected with the corporate mentality that has just about ruined this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joel</title>
		<link>http://joeldowns.com/2007/04/19/why-google-doesn%e2%80%99t-care-about-search/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeldowns.com/2007/04/19/why-google-doesn%e2%80%99t-care-about-search/#comment-96</guid>
		<description>That argument seems to raise this question: are they organizing the world&#039;s data to turn a profit, or are they making a profit so they can afford to organize the world&#039;s data?  I&#039;m pretty sure I know which one of those their shareholders would be voting for.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That argument seems to raise this question: are they organizing the world&#8217;s data to turn a profit, or are they making a profit so they can afford to organize the world&#8217;s data?  I&#8217;m pretty sure I know which one of those their shareholders would be voting for.  <img src='http://joeldowns.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://joeldowns.com/2007/04/19/why-google-doesn%e2%80%99t-care-about-search/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeldowns.com/2007/04/19/why-google-doesn%e2%80%99t-care-about-search/#comment-95</guid>
		<description>While you make a great point, Joel, I believe the two go hand-in-hand.  The more you &quot;organize the world&#039;s information&quot;, the more you can serve ads on top of it.  :-)

I&#039;d also like to point out that Google is now rapidly moving into the software market.  Just ask Microsoft.  This wouldn&#039;t fit the definition of a &quot;pure&quot; ad network.  Like you said, Google is a business interested in the bottom line.  I just don&#039;t think that this is a contradictory goal from their nobler &quot;mission statement&quot;.

It takes a lot of money to organize the world&#039;s data.  It also takes putting your eggs in a lot of baskets.  Google seems to have Green Eggs, and we&#039;re enjoying the Ham.

So, to respond to your last comment, I would just say that there simply is no prioritization when it comes to Google&#039;s philanthropic efforts : You gotta have the cash to do it in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While you make a great point, Joel, I believe the two go hand-in-hand.  The more you &#8220;organize the world&#8217;s information&#8221;, the more you can serve ads on top of it.  <img src='http://joeldowns.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;d also like to point out that Google is now rapidly moving into the software market.  Just ask Microsoft.  This wouldn&#8217;t fit the definition of a &#8220;pure&#8221; ad network.  Like you said, Google is a business interested in the bottom line.  I just don&#8217;t think that this is a contradictory goal from their nobler &#8220;mission statement&#8221;.</p>
<p>It takes a lot of money to organize the world&#8217;s data.  It also takes putting your eggs in a lot of baskets.  Google seems to have Green Eggs, and we&#8217;re enjoying the Ham.</p>
<p>So, to respond to your last comment, I would just say that there simply is no prioritization when it comes to Google&#8217;s philanthropic efforts : You gotta have the cash to do it in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joel</title>
		<link>http://joeldowns.com/2007/04/19/why-google-doesn%e2%80%99t-care-about-search/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 02:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeldowns.com/2007/04/19/why-google-doesn%e2%80%99t-care-about-search/#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Perhaps they haven&#039;t given up, but I&#039;d argue that it conflicts with their primary business model right now.  As soon as Google&#039;s growth slows a little and they have to focus on the bottom line again, we&#039;ll see where their &quot;organize the world&#039;s information&quot; efforts get prioritized compared to their ad network projects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps they haven&#8217;t given up, but I&#8217;d argue that it conflicts with their primary business model right now.  As soon as Google&#8217;s growth slows a little and they have to focus on the bottom line again, we&#8217;ll see where their &#8220;organize the world&#8217;s information&#8221; efforts get prioritized compared to their ad network projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://joeldowns.com/2007/04/19/why-google-doesn%e2%80%99t-care-about-search/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeldowns.com/2007/04/19/why-google-doesn%e2%80%99t-care-about-search/#comment-93</guid>
		<description>I think the reality is less simplistic than you&#039;re making it out to be.  &quot;Google is no longer a search engine.&quot;  That is simply not true.  Ionut Alex Chitu has an excellent article (referencing your own) contradicting that assertion.  http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2007/04/what-has-google-done-in-search-lately.html

You&#039;re absolutely right, Google is an ad network.  That does not mean, however, that it just gave-up the quest &quot;to organize the worldâ€™s information and make it universally accessible and useful&quot;.  It just means that the latter will take a bit more time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the reality is less simplistic than you&#8217;re making it out to be.  &#8220;Google is no longer a search engine.&#8221;  That is simply not true.  Ionut Alex Chitu has an excellent article (referencing your own) contradicting that assertion.  <a href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2007/04/what-has-google-done-in-search-lately.html" rel="nofollow">http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2007/04/what-has-google-done-in-search-lately.html</a></p>
<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right, Google is an ad network.  That does not mean, however, that it just gave-up the quest &#8220;to organize the worldâ€™s information and make it universally accessible and useful&#8221;.  It just means that the latter will take a bit more time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin Haffner</title>
		<link>http://joeldowns.com/2007/04/19/why-google-doesn%e2%80%99t-care-about-search/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Haffner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 05:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeldowns.com/2007/04/19/why-google-doesn%e2%80%99t-care-about-search/#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Oh, I forgot the link:
http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/news/2007/04/mag_schmidt_qa?currentPage=2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I forgot the link:<br />
<a href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/news/2007/04/mag_schmidt_qa?currentPage=2" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/news/2007/04/mag_schmidt_qa?currentPage=2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin Haffner</title>
		<link>http://joeldowns.com/2007/04/19/why-google-doesn%e2%80%99t-care-about-search/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Haffner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 05:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeldowns.com/2007/04/19/why-google-doesn%e2%80%99t-care-about-search/#comment-91</guid>
		<description>This except from a recent Wired magazine interview with Eric Schmidt pretty much says it all:

&quot;Wired: How should we think about Google today?

Schmidt: Think of it first as an advertising system. Then as an end-user system -- Google Apps. A third way to think of Google is as a giant supercomputer. And a fourth way is to think of it as a social phenomenon involving the company, the people, the brand, the mission, the values -- all that kind of stuff.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This except from a recent Wired magazine interview with Eric Schmidt pretty much says it all:</p>
<p>&#8220;Wired: How should we think about Google today?</p>
<p>Schmidt: Think of it first as an advertising system. Then as an end-user system &#8212; Google Apps. A third way to think of Google is as a giant supercomputer. And a fourth way is to think of it as a social phenomenon involving the company, the people, the brand, the mission, the values &#8212; all that kind of stuff.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Staemmler &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; Goolge - Search Goliath and Ad Network</title>
		<link>http://joeldowns.com/2007/04/19/why-google-doesn%e2%80%99t-care-about-search/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Staemmler &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; Goolge - Search Goliath and Ad Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 21:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeldowns.com/2007/04/19/why-google-doesn%e2%80%99t-care-about-search/#comment-90</guid>
		<description>[...] by Jeol Downs from Answerbag.com (Referred by: We are all end users&#8230;) with the title &#8220;Why Google doesn&#8217;t care about Search&#8220;. And even though I like a lot of the services that Google offers I think he makes a very [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Jeol Downs from Answerbag.com (Referred by: We are all end users&#8230;) with the title &#8220;Why Google doesn&#8217;t care about Search&#8220;. And even though I like a lot of the services that Google offers I think he makes a very [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: We are all end users . . . &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google doesn't care about search any more</title>
		<link>http://joeldowns.com/2007/04/19/why-google-doesn%e2%80%99t-care-about-search/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>We are all end users . . . &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google doesn't care about search any more</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeldowns.com/2007/04/19/why-google-doesn%e2%80%99t-care-about-search/#comment-89</guid>
		<description>[...] Joel Downs has written an excellent &#8220;the emperor has no clothes&#8221; post on why Google doesn&#8217;t care about search anymore. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Joel Downs has written an excellent &#8220;the emperor has no clothes&#8221; post on why Google doesn&#8217;t care about search anymore. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peggy Rouse</title>
		<link>http://joeldowns.com/2007/04/19/why-google-doesn%e2%80%99t-care-about-search/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Peggy Rouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeldowns.com/2007/04/19/why-google-doesn%e2%80%99t-care-about-search/#comment-88</guid>
		<description>&quot;Google search is simply a distribution channel for their advertising platform.&quot;  You nailed it. Not that it should come as a surprise to anyone. Look back at the beginning of radio or TV. Hello? Kraft Television Theatre? The Motorola Television Hour? The purpose of mass media has always been to be a distribution channel for advertising. It&#039;s no surprise that search has joined newspapers, magazines, radio and television as part of the mass media landscape.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Google search is simply a distribution channel for their advertising platform.&#8221;  You nailed it. Not that it should come as a surprise to anyone. Look back at the beginning of radio or TV. Hello? Kraft Television Theatre? The Motorola Television Hour? The purpose of mass media has always been to be a distribution channel for advertising. It&#8217;s no surprise that search has joined newspapers, magazines, radio and television as part of the mass media landscape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

