<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wolfram Alpha is a feature, not a search engine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joeldowns.com/2009/04/29/wolfram-alpha-is-a-feature-not-a-search-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joeldowns.com/2009/04/29/wolfram-alpha-is-a-feature-not-a-search-engine/</link>
	<description>Product management in media and tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 05:52:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kindle will be history within a year - The Downside</title>
		<link>http://joeldowns.com/2009/04/29/wolfram-alpha-is-a-feature-not-a-search-engine/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Kindle will be history within a year - The Downside</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeldowns.com/?p=83#comment-125</guid>
		<description>[...] sick as I am of hearing about the underwhelming Wolfram Alpha, I&#8217;m even more sick of hearing about the product-that-shouldn&#8217;t-be, Amazon&#8217;s [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sick as I am of hearing about the underwhelming Wolfram Alpha, I&#8217;m even more sick of hearing about the product-that-shouldn&#8217;t-be, Amazon&#8217;s [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://joeldowns.com/2009/04/29/wolfram-alpha-is-a-feature-not-a-search-engine/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 23:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeldowns.com/?p=83#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Tried WolframAlpha and I am truly horrified by the outcome.  AskJeeves was better 10 years ago.  I tried putting the same search strings that I used in google for some of my technical work and it couldn&#039;t handle it.  I tried asking it basic questions and it wanted clarification.  It is truly the worst search engine I&#039;ve ever seen.

If I type in the example

&quot;How have home prices in San Diego, CA changed in the last 5 years? &quot;

It gives a garbage response asking for clarification.  If I put the same in google I get a decent link.   Either way I will have to click on at least one link (for clarification or to send me to my result).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tried WolframAlpha and I am truly horrified by the outcome.  AskJeeves was better 10 years ago.  I tried putting the same search strings that I used in google for some of my technical work and it couldn&#8217;t handle it.  I tried asking it basic questions and it wanted clarification.  It is truly the worst search engine I&#8217;ve ever seen.</p>
<p>If I type in the example</p>
<p>&#8220;How have home prices in San Diego, CA changed in the last 5 years? &#8221;</p>
<p>It gives a garbage response asking for clarification.  If I put the same in google I get a decent link.   Either way I will have to click on at least one link (for clarification or to send me to my result).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joel</title>
		<link>http://joeldowns.com/2009/04/29/wolfram-alpha-is-a-feature-not-a-search-engine/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeldowns.com/?p=83#comment-123</guid>
		<description>No, I certainly don&#039;t, but I&#039;m sure he has investors, and I&#039;m sure they&#039;d be very interested in an acquisition rather than trying to compete in the search engine world.  There&#039;s no clear method of monetization, either, which says to me a sale to a search engine is probably the intended exit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I certainly don&#8217;t, but I&#8217;m sure he has investors, and I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;d be very interested in an acquisition rather than trying to compete in the search engine world.  There&#8217;s no clear method of monetization, either, which says to me a sale to a search engine is probably the intended exit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rooney</title>
		<link>http://joeldowns.com/2009/04/29/wolfram-alpha-is-a-feature-not-a-search-engine/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Rooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeldowns.com/?p=83#comment-122</guid>
		<description>Acquisition play ? You don&#039;t seem to know Wolfram.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Acquisition play ? You don&#8217;t seem to know Wolfram.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

