<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Wave&#8217;s Fatal Flaws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joeldowns.com/2009/10/15/google-waves-fatal-flaws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joeldowns.com/2009/10/15/google-waves-fatal-flaws/</link>
	<description>Product management in media and tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 05:52:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard C.</title>
		<link>http://joeldowns.com/2009/10/15/google-waves-fatal-flaws/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeldowns.com/?p=286#comment-157</guid>
		<description>i too found myself completely lost / bored with google wave.

i&#039;m thinking...it&#039;s because no one else i know or chat with regularly uses it (ala the first days of gmail). i&#039;m sure in the future when they open it up a bit that it will take off.

now i&#039;m not saying that all the added features will be of any use to anyone or if people really care to be logged into a web page all day JUST to converse with people on gw but we&#039;ll see.  i&#039;m thinking...even if i have three people to &quot;wave&quot; to...i wouldn&#039;t bother.

kinda like twitter....who really cares?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i too found myself completely lost / bored with google wave.</p>
<p>i&#8217;m thinking&#8230;it&#8217;s because no one else i know or chat with regularly uses it (ala the first days of gmail). i&#8217;m sure in the future when they open it up a bit that it will take off.</p>
<p>now i&#8217;m not saying that all the added features will be of any use to anyone or if people really care to be logged into a web page all day JUST to converse with people on gw but we&#8217;ll see.  i&#8217;m thinking&#8230;even if i have three people to &#8220;wave&#8221; to&#8230;i wouldn&#8217;t bother.</p>
<p>kinda like twitter&#8230;.who really cares?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://joeldowns.com/2009/10/15/google-waves-fatal-flaws/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeldowns.com/?p=286#comment-156</guid>
		<description>I agree with everything said with one addition and one reservation. In addition, I&#039;ll just say this: try using it WITHOUT Google Chrome since most of the world will. In reservation, I do believe its adoption will grow significantly over time as new, young, web savvy users join the party. It&#039;s just a little ahead of its time and quite unpolished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with everything said with one addition and one reservation. In addition, I&#8217;ll just say this: try using it WITHOUT Google Chrome since most of the world will. In reservation, I do believe its adoption will grow significantly over time as new, young, web savvy users join the party. It&#8217;s just a little ahead of its time and quite unpolished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://joeldowns.com/2009/10/15/google-waves-fatal-flaws/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 02:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeldowns.com/?p=286#comment-155</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really surprised how bad Google Wave is.  I used it for the first time on Friday, with 3 other people, and it is confusing more than anything else. I&#039;m really not sure what this tool is supposed to help me accomplish.  And yes, the editing of other people&#039;s messages was just plain weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really surprised how bad Google Wave is.  I used it for the first time on Friday, with 3 other people, and it is confusing more than anything else. I&#8217;m really not sure what this tool is supposed to help me accomplish.  And yes, the editing of other people&#8217;s messages was just plain weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joel</title>
		<link>http://joeldowns.com/2009/10/15/google-waves-fatal-flaws/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeldowns.com/?p=286#comment-154</guid>
		<description>Naturally they might fix some of these, but many of them are considered core *features* by the Wave team - if they are removed, it loses differentiation from email, making it even more irrelevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naturally they might fix some of these, but many of them are considered core *features* by the Wave team &#8211; if they are removed, it loses differentiation from email, making it even more irrelevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Rooks</title>
		<link>http://joeldowns.com/2009/10/15/google-waves-fatal-flaws/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Rooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 01:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeldowns.com/?p=286#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Not likely that these will stay &quot;fatal flaws&quot; forever. Keep in mind that if it looks like it&#039;s made by programmers for programmers, it&#039;s because we have access to a very early developers&#039; preview of the service. By their usual standards, I wouldn&#039;t even call this a &quot;beta,&quot; their discontinuation of that term aside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not likely that these will stay &#8220;fatal flaws&#8221; forever. Keep in mind that if it looks like it&#8217;s made by programmers for programmers, it&#8217;s because we have access to a very early developers&#8217; preview of the service. By their usual standards, I wouldn&#8217;t even call this a &#8220;beta,&#8221; their discontinuation of that term aside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

